Chapter 1 · Guide

Introduction

Who we are, why noslegal exists, and the problems it addresses. A plain-language explanation of what a taxonomy is and why a monohierarchical design is right for this context.

1.1Who we are

We are an open source community of lawyers, software and data specialists, legal business and knowledge professionals founded in 2020.2 Our largest project so far has been the taxonomy addressed in this guide.

Our ethos is "open source legal for all of us", reflected in five principles:

  • open source (free to use, study, modify and redistribute for any purpose);3
  • community-based, but with contribution governed for quality;
  • useful in practice, not just theoretically interesting;
  • simple and modular, so outputs can be combined, remixed and extended;
  • broadly relevant to work types, areas of law and internationally. Not based on a single legal culture and with local and specialist needs addressed through extensions bearing in mind the risks of overloading the core.

1.2Our taxonomy and the problems it helps with

Since we released v1 of our taxonomy in 2022, substantial elements have been adopted or used as a starting point by a growing number of law firms, legal departments, and technology providers around the world.

The reason is a structural problem familiar to most legal organisations. Legal work generates enormous amounts of data across matters, knowledge, people and business development. But it typically sits in silos, organised inconsistently if at all. The practical costs are significant: time wasted searching for information that exists but cannot be found; decisions made without access to relevant experience; pricing and planning based on personal experience and intuition rather than historical data; missed opportunities to identify patterns, anticipate demand or demonstrate credentials.

Private taxonomies have mostly failed to solve this. Huge numbers have been created over the years, but they tend to be over-fitted to particular contexts, fragmented by function or geography. They deteriorate over time as design stagnates or accumulates inconsistencies. They're often poorly implemented. And their diversity makes it impractical to map them one-to-one between organisations (e.g. law firm to client).

Modern technology (such as search, graphs, machine learning and language models) holds out the promise of helping significantly, but only when built on an appropriate data foundation. With that foundation in place, the practical benefits compound quickly: better search, better analysis, better knowledge reuse, and the conditions for AI to operate effectively across and between organisations. These improvements in turn open up better outcomes across quality, pricing, service, accessibility and sustainable business models. Our taxonomy provides an important part of that foundation.

1.3What is a taxonomy anyway?

A taxonomy is a tree of concepts addressing a particular topic. Ours is monohierarchical: every child concept has a single parent. The diagram below illustrates the structure and standard terminology.

FACET ROOT e.g. Work types CATEGORY (1st tier) e.g. Transaction CATEGORY (1st tier) e.g. Dispute resolution TYPE (2nd tier) M&A TYPE (2nd tier) Commercial contracts TOPIC (3rd tier) e.g. Share purchase Root concept Category Type Topic

Structure and standard terminology of a monohierarchical taxonomy, illustrated using Work types

We believe a monohierarchical taxonomy is the right choice for the practical purposes addressed in this guide. Its tree structure is more powerful than a flat list of words, definitions and synonyms for most relevant purposes. But it is more accessible to more people and organisations than a full ontology (i.e. flexible relationships, not just monohierarchical ones). See section 3.1 for further discussion of this.

Notes

1We published the first edition of this guide in March 2025 with v3 of the taxonomy and made some minor updates in July 2025. This significantly expanded second edition is being published together with v4 of the taxonomy in May 2026.
2We published a first version of our taxonomy in early 2022, a second major version in 2023, with minor updates to the Places facet in 2024. A third major version followed in 2025 and a fourth in 2026. We established a company limited by guarantee early on to hold relevant IP and license it out on an open source basis. We have minimal operating expenses which are covered by modest sponsorship sums refreshed periodically — current sponsor names are published on our website, https://www.noslegal.org
3Specifically, the taxonomy is released under the Apache 2.0 permissive open source licence.